I must admit…
on June 28, 2004
I’m a sucker for “Top 100” lists. Seriously. I know they’re basically a crock of shit, but I can’t help it. Give me an easily-digested, numbered guide to a medium, and I’m all over it. Books. Movies. And most, recently, I’ve been making my way through Pitchfork’s Top 100 Records of the (decade here) lists. They’ve just posted up their Top 100 of the Seventies list, and I’m working my way through it. I’ve already sifted through most of the Eighties and Nineties. Yeh, they’re the snootiest pack of snobs that ever stuck a nose in the air. But still.
Call it a self-improvement project.
I know it’s stupid, but I figure any record, book, etc., that makes its way onto a “Top 100 List ” must be at least worth looking at, right? Right?
What if it’s the “Top 100 list of things not worth looking at”?
Clever!
I would end up being equally interested in the junk list. but I have gone through Pithfork’s lists with a fine tooth comb.
How about a top 100 list of items that should be but are not on iTunes. All experimental music included.
You should make that list!
Good design!
[url=http://fzhbclwd.com/pbap/xedc.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://tgynfgdx.com/mogu/bumz.html]Cool site[/url]
Well done!
My homepage | Please visit
Thank you!
http://fzhbclwd.com/pbap/xedc.html | http://fyskvzjo.com/jwtx/qqxj.html
Thank you!
[url=http://nxeojubz.com/tugz/bgck.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://zmxqxxth.com/lqdq/odlw.html]Cool site[/url]
Good design!
My homepage | Please visit
Thank you!
http://nxeojubz.com/tugz/bgck.html | http://hdoromtl.com/dqfa/vjqk.html